Check out the originators of the Liberty Tree and friend of liberty
Civil debate is an admired quality in a Republic but justifying, mocking, or celebrating violence, as documented in this video of Charles Booker and his allies, should be rejected. pic.twitter.com/t3hrJBtJPk — Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 3, 2022
Civil debate is an admired quality in a Republic but justifying, mocking, or celebrating violence, as documented in this video of Charles Booker and his allies, should be rejected. pic.twitter.com/t3hrJBtJPk
Btw, censorship won't solve the problem since tech employees and the media are part of the mob. In fact, censorship only fuels the problem by removing one side of the debate. — David Sacks (@DavidSacks) October 3, 2022
Btw, censorship won't solve the problem since tech employees and the media are part of the mob. In fact, censorship only fuels the problem by removing one side of the debate.
Looking forward to reading it John. I appreciate everything you write. — Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) October 1, 2022
Looking forward to reading it John. I appreciate everything you write.
There’s a reason regime Republicans and Democrats want to destroy Section 230: It protects the freedom of speech. Dismantling Section 230 will lead to more censorship of speech that challenges their authority—giving those in power more influence and control over public discourse. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) October 3, 2022
There’s a reason regime Republicans and Democrats want to destroy Section 230: It protects the freedom of speech. Dismantling Section 230 will lead to more censorship of speech that challenges their authority—giving those in power more influence and control over public discourse.
Whatever your views on what former CIA Director Leon Panetta calls the "US proxy war" against Russia over Ukraine, it's stunning how little discussion and debate there is -- including, or rather especially, in the US Congress -- given the grave risks and dangers at play here. — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 4, 2022
Whatever your views on what former CIA Director Leon Panetta calls the "US proxy war" against Russia over Ukraine, it's stunning how little discussion and debate there is -- including, or rather especially, in the US Congress -- given the grave risks and dangers at play here.
On Monday, a video clip of Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs saying he believed the United States more likely destroyed the Nord Stream pipeline than U.S. government claims that Russia did.
During an interview on Bloomberg TV, Sachs delved into "the destruction of the Nord Stream Pipeline, which I would bet was a U.S. action, perhaps U.S. and Poland. That is speculation."
The Bloomberg host interjected, "Jeff, we've got to stop there. Why do you feel that was a U.S. action? What evidence do you have of that?"
Sachs proceeded to give the audience an earful.
CNBC host panics when guest speculates that the Nord Stream pipeline bombing was a "U.S. operation." The guest is asked to back up his statement... and he does 😳 pic.twitter.com/TGHYt9aC8C — Young Americans for Liberty (@YALiberty) October 3, 2022
CNBC host panics when guest speculates that the Nord Stream pipeline bombing was a "U.S. operation."
Sachs explained, "Well, first, there is direct radar evidence that U.S. military helicopters that are normally based in Gdansk were circling over this area. We also had the threat from the U.S. [President Biden] earlier this year that 'one way or another we are going to end Nord Stream."
"We also had a remarkable statement from Sec. Blinken last Friday in a press conference where he said 'this is also a tremendous opportunity," Sachs continued. "That's a strange way to talk if you're worried about piracy on the international infrastructure of vital significance."
"I know it runs counter to our narrative, you're not allowed to say these things in the West, but the fact of the matter is all over the world when I talk to people, they think the U.S. did it," he admitted. "Even reporters on our papers that are involved tell me 'of course' [the U.S. did it], but it doesn't show up in our media."
Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald wondered why journalists weren't asking who blew up Nord Stream rather than just accepting government claims at face value.
Nothing angers employees of large Western media corporations more than suggestions that US intelligence services may not be telling the truth and might do bad things. The ideology of corporate media isn't so much "left" or "right" as it is subservience to establishment power. https://t.co/XNaI4dmiuU — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 3, 2022
Nothing angers employees of large Western media corporations more than suggestions that US intelligence services may not be telling the truth and might do bad things.
Some journalists have asked questions.
Tucker Carlson questions what happened to the Nord Stream pipeline: "Did the Biden administration really do this?" OMGosh, just listen — the thought of this is horrifying!pic.twitter.com/bxf5nsSD10 — NEWSNANCY (@NewsNancy9) September 28, 2022
Tucker Carlson questions what happened to the Nord Stream pipeline:
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the bombing of the pipelines "offers a tremendous opportunity" three days before saying bombing them was "in no one's interest."
Sec. State Blinken: Nordstream Bombing 'Offers Tremendous Opportunity' - today on the Liberty Report:https://t.co/zAzhTd1PHy — Ron Paul (@RonPaul) October 3, 2022
Sec. State Blinken: Nordstream Bombing 'Offers Tremendous Opportunity' - today on the Liberty Report:https://t.co/zAzhTd1PHy
Blinken Sept 27: Sabotage of Nord Stream gas pipelines “in no one’s interest” Blinken Sept 30: Destruction of pipelines a “tremendous strategic opportunity” to “pursue the transition to renewables” pic.twitter.com/pioYYU8PZz — Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) October 2, 2022
Blinken Sept 27: Sabotage of Nord Stream gas pipelines “in no one’s interest”
Back in January, the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nulan said that "Nord Stream 2 will not move forward" if Russia invaded Ukraine.
President Joe Biden said the U.S. "would bring and end" to Nord Stream
“If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." - President Joe Biden. pic.twitter.com/B96Q7Qffny — Cernovich (@Cernovich) September 27, 2022
“If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." - President Joe Biden.
That's a lot to work with. There should be more questions. Not less.
We’ve now lost more due to inflation than the government gave out in the form of "free" money. It's time to stop digging the hole and get back to fiscal sanity. Let's fight back: https://t.co/pHGnpb7z9u pic.twitter.com/WrczKoBzir — Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 3, 2022
We’ve now lost more due to inflation than the government gave out in the form of "free" money. It's time to stop digging the hole and get back to fiscal sanity. Let's fight back: https://t.co/pHGnpb7z9u pic.twitter.com/WrczKoBzir
Why does Joe Biden treat natural immunity like a conspiracy theory? “Prior infection with Omicron granted stronger protection: it was 79.7% effective at preventing BA.4 and BA.5 reinfection and 76.1% effective at preventing symptomatic reinfection.”https://t.co/SbP9tm0Wc2 — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) October 3, 2022
Why does Joe Biden treat natural immunity like a conspiracy theory? “Prior infection with Omicron granted stronger protection: it was 79.7% effective at preventing BA.4 and BA.5 reinfection and 76.1% effective at preventing symptomatic reinfection.”https://t.co/SbP9tm0Wc2
Calling all good citizens! The people that brought you the Ministry of Truth are asking for you to inform on your doctors. Apparently, without your help, they do not yet have the capacity to look everywhere. Doctors, be careful what you say online. The @NLFD_org is watching! /s https://t.co/KbNNmPngNB — Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) October 3, 2022
Calling all good citizens! The people that brought you the Ministry of Truth are asking for you to inform on your doctors. Apparently, without your help, they do not yet have the capacity to look everywhere. Doctors, be careful what you say online. The @NLFD_org is watching! /s https://t.co/KbNNmPngNB
Democrats in Congress are 100% dedicated to the COVID pharma cult. Especially when it comes to decimating our military. There are 86 cosponsors of my bill to prohibit forced COVID jabs for members of the military, but ZERO democrats have cosponsored.https://t.co/E2IdPI7Z9w — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) October 2, 2022
Democrats in Congress are 100% dedicated to the COVID pharma cult. Especially when it comes to decimating our military. There are 86 cosponsors of my bill to prohibit forced COVID jabs for members of the military, but ZERO democrats have cosponsored.https://t.co/E2IdPI7Z9w
Sen. Mike Lee
Randall G. Holcombe
John C. Goodman
Stephen P. Halbrook
James Tooley
S. Fred Singer
Adam Brandon
Mike Lee
Rand Paul