Check out the originators of the Liberty Tree and friend of liberty
Follow the science that doesn't exist! https://t.co/POZU6FuFU8 — Young Americans for Liberty (@YALiberty) October 4, 2022
Follow the science that doesn't exist! https://t.co/POZU6FuFU8
FBI tracked Aretha Franklin for 40 years, declassified documents show https://t.co/sIQQuOPjFv pic.twitter.com/XpSSbmzb1E — New York Post (@nypost) October 4, 2022
FBI tracked Aretha Franklin for 40 years, declassified documents show https://t.co/sIQQuOPjFv pic.twitter.com/XpSSbmzb1E
Retired general and former Pentagon official Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt tells CNN the U.S. should consider launching a NUCLEAR strike on Russia as an option. pic.twitter.com/DUVauKD9FU — Young Americans for Liberty (@YALiberty) October 4, 2022
Retired general and former Pentagon official Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt tells CNN the U.S. should consider launching a NUCLEAR strike on Russia as an option. pic.twitter.com/DUVauKD9FU
Btw, censorship won't solve the problem since tech employees and the media are part of the mob. In fact, censorship only fuels the problem by removing one side of the debate. — David Sacks (@DavidSacks) October 3, 2022
Btw, censorship won't solve the problem since tech employees and the media are part of the mob. In fact, censorship only fuels the problem by removing one side of the debate.
Looking forward to reading it John. I appreciate everything you write. — Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) October 1, 2022
Looking forward to reading it John. I appreciate everything you write.
There’s a reason regime Republicans and Democrats want to destroy Section 230: It protects the freedom of speech. Dismantling Section 230 will lead to more censorship of speech that challenges their authority—giving those in power more influence and control over public discourse. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) October 3, 2022
There’s a reason regime Republicans and Democrats want to destroy Section 230: It protects the freedom of speech. Dismantling Section 230 will lead to more censorship of speech that challenges their authority—giving those in power more influence and control over public discourse.
Whatever your views on what former CIA Director Leon Panetta calls the "US proxy war" against Russia over Ukraine, it's stunning how little discussion and debate there is -- including, or rather especially, in the US Congress -- given the grave risks and dangers at play here. — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 4, 2022
Whatever your views on what former CIA Director Leon Panetta calls the "US proxy war" against Russia over Ukraine, it's stunning how little discussion and debate there is -- including, or rather especially, in the US Congress -- given the grave risks and dangers at play here.
On Monday, a video clip of Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs saying he believed the United States more likely destroyed the Nord Stream pipeline than U.S. government claims that Russia did.
During an interview on Bloomberg TV, Sachs delved into "the destruction of the Nord Stream Pipeline, which I would bet was a U.S. action, perhaps U.S. and Poland. That is speculation."
The Bloomberg host interjected, "Jeff, we've got to stop there. Why do you feel that was a U.S. action? What evidence do you have of that?"
Sachs proceeded to give the audience an earful.
CNBC host panics when guest speculates that the Nord Stream pipeline bombing was a "U.S. operation." The guest is asked to back up his statement... and he does 😳 pic.twitter.com/TGHYt9aC8C — Young Americans for Liberty (@YALiberty) October 3, 2022
CNBC host panics when guest speculates that the Nord Stream pipeline bombing was a "U.S. operation."
Sachs explained, "Well, first, there is direct radar evidence that U.S. military helicopters that are normally based in Gdansk were circling over this area. We also had the threat from the U.S. [President Biden] earlier this year that 'one way or another we are going to end Nord Stream."
"We also had a remarkable statement from Sec. Blinken last Friday in a press conference where he said 'this is also a tremendous opportunity," Sachs continued. "That's a strange way to talk if you're worried about piracy on the international infrastructure of vital significance."
"I know it runs counter to our narrative, you're not allowed to say these things in the West, but the fact of the matter is all over the world when I talk to people, they think the U.S. did it," he admitted. "Even reporters on our papers that are involved tell me 'of course' [the U.S. did it], but it doesn't show up in our media."
Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald wondered why journalists weren't asking who blew up Nord Stream rather than just accepting government claims at face value.
Nothing angers employees of large Western media corporations more than suggestions that US intelligence services may not be telling the truth and might do bad things. The ideology of corporate media isn't so much "left" or "right" as it is subservience to establishment power. https://t.co/XNaI4dmiuU — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 3, 2022
Nothing angers employees of large Western media corporations more than suggestions that US intelligence services may not be telling the truth and might do bad things.
Some journalists have asked questions.
Tucker Carlson questions what happened to the Nord Stream pipeline: "Did the Biden administration really do this?" OMGosh, just listen — the thought of this is horrifying!pic.twitter.com/bxf5nsSD10 — NEWSNANCY (@NewsNancy9) September 28, 2022
Tucker Carlson questions what happened to the Nord Stream pipeline:
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the bombing of the pipelines "offers a tremendous opportunity" three days before saying bombing them was "in no one's interest."
Sec. State Blinken: Nordstream Bombing 'Offers Tremendous Opportunity' - today on the Liberty Report:https://t.co/zAzhTd1PHy — Ron Paul (@RonPaul) October 3, 2022
Sec. State Blinken: Nordstream Bombing 'Offers Tremendous Opportunity' - today on the Liberty Report:https://t.co/zAzhTd1PHy
Blinken Sept 27: Sabotage of Nord Stream gas pipelines “in no one’s interest” Blinken Sept 30: Destruction of pipelines a “tremendous strategic opportunity” to “pursue the transition to renewables” pic.twitter.com/pioYYU8PZz — Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) October 2, 2022
Blinken Sept 27: Sabotage of Nord Stream gas pipelines “in no one’s interest”
Back in January, the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nulan said that "Nord Stream 2 will not move forward" if Russia invaded Ukraine.
President Joe Biden said the U.S. "would bring and end" to Nord Stream
“If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." - President Joe Biden. pic.twitter.com/B96Q7Qffny — Cernovich (@Cernovich) September 27, 2022
“If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." - President Joe Biden.
That's a lot to work with. There should be more questions. Not less.
Calling all good citizens! The people that brought you the Ministry of Truth are asking for you to inform on your doctors. Apparently, without your help, they do not yet have the capacity to look everywhere. Doctors, be careful what you say online. The @NLFD_org is watching! /s https://t.co/KbNNmPngNB — Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) October 3, 2022
Calling all good citizens! The people that brought you the Ministry of Truth are asking for you to inform on your doctors. Apparently, without your help, they do not yet have the capacity to look everywhere. Doctors, be careful what you say online. The @NLFD_org is watching! /s https://t.co/KbNNmPngNB
Dear Congress: On behalf of my fellow Florida Man in grave need of assistance…. Just send us like half of what you sent Ukraine. Signed, Your Fellow Americans — Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) October 2, 2022
Dear Congress: On behalf of my fellow Florida Man in grave need of assistance…. Just send us like half of what you sent Ukraine. Signed, Your Fellow Americans