<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberty Treenot for sale Archives - Liberty Tree</title>
	<atom:link href="https://libertytree.com/tag/not-for-sale/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://libertytree.com/tag/not-for-sale</link>
	<description>Here you will find the leading voices of liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:33:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Congress should pass the &#8216;Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1950</link>
				<comments>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1950#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty Tree]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Deise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedomworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not for sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://libertytree.com/?p=1950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congress should pass the &#8216;Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act&#8217; FreedomWorks’ Alex Deise writes, “We’ve all watched the cringeworthy hearings where senators take turns ‘grilling’ Big Tech CEOs over why their constituent emails have such low open rates. While<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span></p>
<div class="read-more"><a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1950">Read more &#8250;<!-- end of .read-more --></a></div>
<p>The post <a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1950">Congress should pass the &#8216;Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://libertytree.com">Liberty Tree</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><strong>Congress should pass the &#8216;Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act&#8217;</strong></h1>
<p><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1951" src="https://libertytree.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Untitled-design-2022-01-12T183225.320-1024x576.png" alt="" width="1024" height="576" /></p>
<p class="p1"><a href="https://www.freedomworks.org/content/congress-should-pass-fourth-amendment-not-sale-act" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FreedomWorks’</a> Alex Deise writes, “We’ve all watched the cringeworthy hearings where senators take turns ‘grilling’ Big Tech CEOs over why their constituent emails have such low open rates. While the fight over regulating Big Tech rages, Americans’ 4th Amendment rights continue to be abused in other areas that do in fact require a measured response. As it turns out, such a remedy already exists.</p>
<p class="p1">Last April, a group of bipartisan senators introduced <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1265"><span class="s1">The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA).</span></a></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">&#8220;Congress should pass the &#8216;Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act&#8221; (<a href="https://twitter.com/TheHillOpinion?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheHillOpinion</a>) <a href="https://t.co/08uQmBhqZa">https://t.co/08uQmBhqZa</a> <a href="https://t.co/kbersS42DW">pic.twitter.com/kbersS42DW</a></p>
<p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1481314808758734850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2022</a></p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p class="p1">In the Senate, the bill enjoys 20 co-sponsors ranging from Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to Bernie Sanders (I-VT). While the House companion bill is sponsored by Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), the bill has yet to see the light of day. That must change.</p>
<p class="p1">The Fourth Amendment protects the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, unless the government acts with a judicially granted warrant supported by probable cause or there is an applicable exception to the warrant. The Supreme Court has recognized that the Fourth Amendment provides protection from government searches when a person has a subjective expectation of privacy that society recognizes as objectively reasonable.”</p>
<p class="p1">Read the entire <a href="https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/589381-congress-should-pass-the-fourth-amendment-is-not-for-sale-act" target="_blank" rel="noopener">column</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1950">Congress should pass the &#8216;Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://libertytree.com">Liberty Tree</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1950/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
