<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberty Treecost Archives - Liberty Tree</title>
	<atom:link href="https://libertytree.com/tag/cost/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://libertytree.com/tag/cost</link>
	<description>Here you will find the leading voices of liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:33:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>‘Build Back Better’ will likely cost double what the CBO projects</title>
		<link>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1721</link>
				<comments>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1721#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty Tree]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build back better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Boehm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://liberty-tree-landing.local/?p=1721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>‘Build Back Better’ will likely cost double what the CBO projects Reason’s Eric Boehm writes, “President Joe Biden&#8217;s Build Back Better Act is likely to end up costing taxpayers about double what the official price tag suggests, and much of<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span></p>
<div class="read-more"><a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1721">Read more &#8250;<!-- end of .read-more --></a></div>
<p>The post <a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1721">‘Build Back Better’ will likely cost double what the CBO projects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://libertytree.com">Liberty Tree</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 class="p1"><b>‘Build Back Better’ will likely cost double what the CBO projects</b></h1>
<p><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1653" src="https://libertytree.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Biden-is-shooting-holes-in-the-constitution-47-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="576" /></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><a href="https://reason.com/2021/12/01/bidens-build-back-better-act-will-likely-cost-twice-as-much-as-the-cbo-projects-heres-why/">Reason’s</a></span> Eric Boehm writes, “President Joe Biden&#8217;s Build Back Better Act is likely to end up costing taxpayers about double what the official price tag suggests, and much of that hidden cost will end up being added to the national debt.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">If all the Build Back Better plan&#8217;s proposals were made permanent, the final price tag would be $4.8 trillion and the bill would add about $2.8 trillion to the deficit.<a href="https://t.co/eUhD1G1eRQ">https://t.co/eUhD1G1eRQ</a></p>
<p>— reason (@reason) <a href="https://twitter.com/reason/status/1466197173905862657?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2021</a></p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p class="p1">That&#8217;s the conclusion from two independent analyses of the proposal released in recent weeks. Both rely on a key assumption that did not figure into the Congressional Budget Office&#8217;s (CBO) analysis of the bill: that the Build Back Better plan&#8217;s various policies will be in place for at least the next 10 years.</p>
<p class="p1">‘The Build Back Better Act relies on a number of <a href="https://www.crfb.org/press-releases/new-build-back-better-framework-relies-too-heavily-gimmicks"><span class="s1">arbitrary sunsets</span></a> and expirations to lower the official cost of the bill,’ <a href="https://www.crfb.org/blogs/permanent-build-back-better-act-could-cost-4-8-trillion"><span class="s1">explains</span></a> the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), a nonprofit that advocates for balanced budgets. The group&#8217;s newly updated <a href="https://www.crfb.org/blogs/permanent-build-back-better-act-could-cost-4-8-trillion"><span class="s1">analysis</span></a> of the Build Back Better plan finds that the package will cost an estimated $4.8 trillion over 10 years if all provisions are made permanent—double <a href="https://reason.com/2021/11/18/cbo-bidens-build-back-better-plan-will-add-367-billion-to-the-deficit/"><span class="s1">the price tag applied by the CBO</span></a> last month.”</p>
<p class="p1">Read the entire <a href="https://reason.com/2021/12/01/bidens-build-back-better-act-will-likely-cost-twice-as-much-as-the-cbo-projects-heres-why/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">column</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1721">‘Build Back Better’ will likely cost double what the CBO projects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://libertytree.com">Liberty Tree</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1721/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The true costs of Biden&#8217;s infrastructure bill, explained</title>
		<link>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1638</link>
				<comments>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1638#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 07:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty Tree]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jacobsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://liberty-tree-landing.local/?p=1638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The true costs of Biden&#8217;s infrastructure bill, explained FEE’s Peter Jacobsen writes, “Congress recently passed the White House’s Infrastructure Bill to the tune of $1 trillion. President Joe Biden is expected to sign the legislation into law on Monday. In the lead-up<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span></p>
<div class="read-more"><a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1638">Read more &#8250;<!-- end of .read-more --></a></div>
<p>The post <a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1638">The true costs of Biden&#8217;s infrastructure bill, explained</a> appeared first on <a href="https://libertytree.com">Liberty Tree</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 class="p1"><b>The true costs of Biden&#8217;s infrastructure bill, explained</b></h1>
<p><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1639" src="https://libertytree.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Biden-is-shooting-holes-in-the-constitution-27-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="576" /></p>
<p class="p1"><a href="https://fee.org/articles/the-true-costs-of-bidens-infrastructure-bill-explained/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FEE’s</a> Peter Jacobsen writes, “Congress recently passed the White House’s Infrastructure Bill to the tune of $1 trillion. President Joe Biden <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/10/biden-to-sign-1-trillion-infrastructure-bill-on-monday.html"><span class="s1">is expected</span></a> to sign the legislation into law on Monday.</p>
<p class="p1">In the lead-up to the vote, the administration and House Democrats were oddly adamant that the bill would cost zero dollars. That’s right, a free $1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">There’s no such thing as free infrastructure. <a href="https://t.co/O5AbacTK0j">https://t.co/O5AbacTK0j</a></p>
<p>— FEE (@feeonline) <a href="https://twitter.com/feeonline/status/1460350243724271626?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 15, 2021</a></p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><a href="https://fee.org/articles/biden-bizarrely-and-falsely-claims-his-35-trillion-spending-agenda-has-a-price-tag-of-zero/">Another FEE article</a></span> already debunked this claim with thorough examination of the concept of forgone alternatives. However, following the poor reception of the rhetoric that the infrastructure bill would cost nothing, messaging seems to have pivoted to a less dubious position. Namely, that the infrastructure bill will not add a penny to the deficit.</p>
<p class="p1">There is more truth to this assertion than the last, but a thorough examination still finds this claim wanting. Why? In order to understand, we need to, again, consider the forgone alternatives.”</p>
<p class="p1">Read the entire <a href="https://fee.org/articles/the-true-costs-of-bidens-infrastructure-bill-explained/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">column</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1638">The true costs of Biden&#8217;s infrastructure bill, explained</a> appeared first on <a href="https://libertytree.com">Liberty Tree</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/1638/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
